>>906981
Hey those are Duck's spices, let's not take them.

>>906977
Hmm yeah Oven sounds good, and I bet a Brick type would be really tough!
Other ideas: Speed(action), Reversal(action AND regret oooh), Mortar

Kiln... How about we spawn a Godzilla type?

Create: Kiln.
Create: Basic Brick Cookbook.

Nice cheeks dude. Anyway, we shouldn't get too mad at Gumby yet, it's more Wax's fault anyway, and the game can easily go in a totally pleasant direction as long as no one's an asshole. In the meantime we can take a principled stance in favor of TCP self-determination, and encourage others to do the same. A good way to get started on that would be to let Duck keep the CREATE command. If we want to make more stuff we can just ask them to do it for us.

>>906953
Nice ass.

Alright, Hazel, the next thing you should check is your gender. which one are you: male, female, or neither?

.....also, you might want to call Gumby back and try to apologize for that outburst.

Or you could instead check on Duck and see what she’s up to.

>>906979
Correction: Buns on the oven!

wait wait wait. slow ur roll everyone.

I mean, Hazel has a big objection to the fact that these are real people, right? Don't you think that would mean we *shouldn't* go around throwing new people into this situation until we learn exactly what it entails? Like, for the sake of ethics, let's not try to spawn anyone until we can get some answers about this. Or at least work some things out. Let's at least wait to spawn someone until we can talk to gumby or wax again.

>>906965
also, this, but for added fun let's ask Duck to make it and see what she comes up with, and then take it.

seconding leviathan type

When will they learn. When will the gods learn. That actions. Have consequences.

>>906995
We are already doing some great improvements thanks to Gumby being the catalyst. In the same vein, no person should be made alone. Granted, Duck is a Dragon, a creature not typically known for social skills, but still, one way or another, Duck's going to need a friend. We'll have a back-up or sidekick on reserve in case something horrible happens to Duck. A person can't do all things themself, and having someone that got your back is definitely a stress reliever.

Take: Create Command from Duck
Combine: Fog of War && Fridge

Create: A machine that produces those things that Duck likes/hoards on command that circumvents the law of conservation of mass

>>906977
We shouldn't make TCPs just so that they're like us to stoke our ego. A Gem Type would be very compatible with Duck, and Duck shouldn't have to be alone.

>>907012
Gumby said we'll have six team members. So that will allow us to user 3 for one theme and 3 for another theme. And there we go. 3 tcps with a dragon/treasure theme and 3 with a clay/oven/fire theme.

for people saying that we should make someone right now to give Duck a friend:

maaaaybe ask Duck if she wants another TCP first?

Let Duck keep the Create command. Not that you can Take it back unless she gives it up.

>>907013
There's that word 'use'. We shouldn't be 'using' them, we should be helping them.

>>907039
It can be argued that using game mechanics to give them boosts is helping them.

Did... Did Duck just fill the entire interior of the island with treasure?

...

I see no problems here.

>>907050
Which island though? I hope it's not Dunk Island.

Gem-type sounds like a bad choice. Duck will want to keep Gem-type and hoard them. Let's avoid treasure types.

>>907013
Dragon already fits the fire theme. I thought we were doing a beast thing when the next suggested thing was leviathan.

>>907040
Saying we should 'use' them sets a pretty bad contextual meaning that doesn't sound like the intent has them in mind at all.

>>907067
That's not what context means. One word does not create context.
In this context(when using the damn word correctly), we are "using" the TCP slots, not the TCPs themselves. Don't be so literal.

Hey Hazel, we should let you know that we've played this game before. We haven't beaten it yet, and this is a much older version, but there's some stuff we already know about it. Like how this version of the game doesn't seem to have autobalancing, which could cause a disaster REAL quick if there aren't other details about the prealpha that would make that less of an issue. Also, the version we had didn't have TAKE, INSERT, COMBINE, etc., so I move to abuse these as much as possible because they were clearly removed in future versions for balance or peace reasons. (We already took the fog of war, for instance.)

Omg, Duck has ascended!

We need a fucking blunt, a beanbag chair, a hoodie, and a rasta hat. Anyhoo, we have a bunch of good, but random, shit. Lets fill it in a bit. Add a library (or at least a shelf) for the forbidden texts books, an armory for the firearm(s) (or at least a gun locker. An armory and a gun locker may already be present on the empty aircraft carrier we made). Tanks to hold the damn fuel. A (furniture) media center for all of the tech and media in the carrier's briefing room (cuz water and electronics dont mix very well).

Also, lets take the create command back from Duck so we can create a create command to give them. Then, and this is the big one, lets create a Teach command, and then teach all of the backlogged teach commands after telling Duck to brace themselves.

I wonder if you can CREATE the power to CREATE? I mean if you can manipulate it with other actions, you should be able to, right? Maybe asking Duck to CREATE CREATE COMMAND and then taking that would be easier than asking them to give the only one away.

Also, wonder if we can contact Wax? Maybe just SAY "hey Wax I wanna talk to you" and that'd work. This whole thing is kinda messed up what with you just being born and from how he was acting I think maybe Wax isn't fully aware that his game basically just generated a confused totally new god with no idea what's what about anything except what a bunch of voices (from another world and with limited/flawed knowledge of the game and whatever world these other gods come from) know about. That's kind of a big deal and he didn't act like it was a big deal. It's pretty fucked. You know? So maybe it was unintended.

I mean it's the same thing you just confronted Gumby about basically. You're a person and you've been created to play with? You're just in a more powerful position.

>>907078
Gumby confirmed this a few updates ago.

>>906977
Speaking of which, I wonder if Duck now has domain synergy due to Arcane Fire.
Leviathan is also described as breathing fire, so if Duck has domain synergy, a Leviathan TCP probably would too.

Not sure what exactly our action domains would manifest as for purposes of synergy. In the best case any moving thing that shouldn't counts, in which case all undead, and other animated beings have synergy via that. Probably more likely TCP based upon an action in some way, though.

Will-o-wisp would fit arcane fire.
Phoenix would too, probably.
Kirin/Qilin would fit arcane fire, due to being described as covered in "holy fire".
Golem would fit clay.
Assuming undead that arise from unburied corpses falls under regret, I'd recommend a Gashadokuro TCP. Skeletons that arise from from the amassed bones of people who died of starvation or in battle without being buried, and are fifteen times the size of a man. They're invisible and indestructible, with the only way to easily detect them being the fact that nearby people hear a loud ringing. They're noted to be vulnerable to shinto charms, though, and similar stuff would probably affect a TCP.

>>907105
I'd be down for a Phoenix, but the giant skelly sounds like trying to use the TCP to powergame without considering how it will affect their interactions with others.

>>906961

>Hmm. You know, maybe for all our conveniences' sake, since you've got yourself fully formed now, could you give us a general stock-taking of everything you have to work with at the moment?

im pretty sure "CHECK: for ass" accomplished that already

SAY: Yo Duck can we see that create command again for a bit? We'll give it back, we promise.
TAKE: CREATE command from Duck
CREATE: CREATE command
GIVE: 1x CREATE command to Duck
CREATE: TAKE command
GIVE: 1x TAKE command to Duck

>>907077
Also, seconding creating a TEACH command.

As neat as having a proxy god would be, I'd like to do this without having Duke playing for us. Could you dudes not give all our powers to our TCP?

Create: destroy command
Destroy: create command

SPAWN: Lasagna-type

>>907170
give - duck undo command
take - undo command
undo - destroy create command

Voting against further messing with commands.

Cool you have already established yourself as a benevolent memelord. It's good to be sure the cats are getting taken care of if they're people, yeah. Sheesh. But don't be too pissed at gumby yet, we don't really know that much information about what's going on.

>>906949
make a vaguely dick shape if you look at it at the right angle clay figure with your kiln. its important to all artists to make a dick at some point in life might as well be now

>>907504
Why limit ourselves. Lets have it all!

If you do manage to get the create command back, make golems. Like just a ton of golems. Pirate golems! Those ones'll need to be hollow or something, but a ship needs a crew. Also servant golems to pamper your cats, and builders, and an army. Just pile on the golems.

>>907623
Lets make them tactical military (infantry) golems.

I for one enjoy the handicap of not having a create command.

It will force us to think creatively.

What is the blue shit Duck made a mountain of?

>>908065
Ah, they are spice jars. (though whether melange or deodorant, we may never know)

Can we do the create transfer/clone thing now?
(Take:create command from duck
Create:create command
Insert: create command in duck)

Then do my teaching suggestion (>>907077),

Then, Teach: Sexuality, Perversion, Innuendo, Juvenile Humor, and Internet Culture to Duck.

Then Create: controllable TCP-scale manifestation of ourself next to duck. Tap duck. Ask "What Do?"

Give: all commands to Duck

>>908075
Negatory chieferino, we gotta save some for our other boys and girls.

I highly suggest against creating a teach command, especially the opening the knowledge flood gate that comes after it. Maybe we can do a little workaround.

CREATE: single-use Teaching Stone of Reading

>>908105
Flood wont be an issue if you are prepared for it. We just need to tell duck before we do it.

>Teach: Sexuality, Perversion, Innuendo, Juvenile Humor, and Internet Culture to Duck.

I exercise my Veto power that I just now declare that I have to say no to all of this.

>>908183
>>908083
Let's not get down this rabbit hole again. Just try and trust Hazel not to follow suggests blindly rather than reintroducing the countervote crap.

>>908183
But we need the dirty jokes! :(